Comparison
HACKvsCIBR
Costs, weighted holdings overlap, sector exposure, and technicals — structured side by side.
Holdings overlap
40.3% shared weight · active-share ≈ 15.2% · 8 names
Shared & unique holdings
See which names drive the overlap and what each fund owns alone.
Fund snapshot
HACKCIBR
- Holding count
HACK
10CIBR
10 - Top 10 concentration
HACK
53.1%CIBR
57.9% - Risk score
HACK
60CIBR
60 - Rating
HACK
BearishCIBR
Bearish
Technicals
HACKCIBR
- Price
HACK
$119.46CIBR
$101.67 - Trend
HACK
Strong UptrendCIBR
Strong Uptrend - RSI
HACK
65.10CIBR
68.75 - MACD signal
HACK
bullishCIBR
bullish - EMA 20
HACK
117.73CIBR
99.68 - EMA 50
HACK
113.33CIBR
96.24 - % from 52w high
HACK
-3.7%CIBR
-2.3%
Top holdings
Sector exposure
HACK
- Technology91.3%
- Industrials8.8%
CIBR
- Technology95.0%
- Industrials3.1%
- Communication Services1.9%